News Update :
Mogelijk gemaakt door Blogger.
Posts tonen met het label Facebook. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label Facebook. Alle posts tonen

Former Teacher Posted Tragic Suicide Note on Facebook Before Killing Himself (VIDEO)

Penulis : Unknown on maandag 23 september 2013 | 17:40

maandag 23 september 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Rebecca Stokes 1 hour ago

keyboardA former high school teacher took his own life last week after posting a suicide note on Facebook. Sources say the man, Christopher Swanson, 41, was despondent after losing his teaching license and may have been obsessed with a former student.

His body was found in front of a fountain on the Mercyhurst University campus in Erie. Police say he died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head. In previous Facebook posts, Swanson had mentioned that his former student was now a freshman at Mercyhurst, but that is currently unconfirmed. 

The tragic questions: If Swanson was so open about his plans, why did no one reach out to help him until it was too late? Did no one read it? Did no one take him seriously?

In addition to posting on Facebook, Swanson also had a website where he discussed the turns in his life that he believed had contributed to his increasing feelings of hopelessness. Chief among them, his belief that his former student would never reciprocate his feelings.

Adding to this tragedy is that in spite of his website and Internet activity, Swanson was unable to connect with resources that could have provided help. For all its size, the Internet can still be an exceptionally lonely place. What a tragedy.

His death prompted Mercyhurst President Tom Gamble to reach out to the university community via video. Gamble implored people to turn to their faith in this troubling time.

What would you do if you thought you saw a suicide note online?

Please call 1-800-273-8255 to reach the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline in case you are worried about yourself or someone else.

Image via Michael Schreifels/Flickr

Rebecca Stokes ABOUT THE AUTHOR Rebecca Stokes

Rebecca is a writer who lives in Brooklyn with her cats. She is probably even at this moment spilling food on herself.

More
?
reacties | | Read More...

Facebook Spammers' Obscene Earnings Mean Annoying Ads Aren't Going Away

Penulis : Unknown on vrijdag 30 augustus 2013 | 05:58

vrijdag 30 augustus 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Linda Sharps 3 hours ago

Facebook spamHave you ever clicked over to check your Facebook feed only to get slapped in the eyeballs with a giant screaming ad for ACAI BERRY DIET ENDR0RSED BY DR OZ!!11!!! Of course you have, because as hard as Facebook works to get rid of scams, hoaxes, and malware, they can't keep up with the slimy bastards that are infiltrating the site.

I've wondered more than once why spam doesn't just disappear -- at this point, doesn't it seem like most of us are savvy enough to recognize a request to "Click here for a free iPhone!!" as the phony offer it is? But according to the data recently shared with The Guardian by a team of Italian security researchers, Facebook spam is here to stay. Because -- I hope you're sitting down for this -- spammers who post bogus links to Facebook pages are earning about $200 million per year for their efforts.

$200. MILLION. Hell, I might consider going into the spam business for that kind of cash.

These security experts say that spammers typically use link-shortening services such as TinyURL and bit.ly to mask the true destination of the link, and Google is raking in some cash from these scam artists' services, because about 9 percent of the spam pages they studied were using Google AdSense. But the real money goes to the folks who are busy posting those ripoff links:

The spam posters get paid an average of $13 per post for pages that have around 30,000 fans, up to an average of $58 to post on pages with more than 100,000 fans. If we consider these two as extremes, the pages we analyzed generate 18,000 posts per day, times the revenue per post — ranging from $13 to $58 — 365 days per year.

The average in earnings studied was just over $200 million annually. Sleazy third parties are paying the spammers to post these links, and the spammers themselves say they provide a valuable service. According to one spammer who spoke with the research team via Skype,

Every day, I materialize funny and interesting content full of phrases and so forth that is shared and liked by thousands of users. Without the fan pages, Facebook would be an empty place. Tell me how many links do you see shared by your friends on your Timeline every day? You see: The answer is simple.

Some spammers are setting up fake fan pages and start selling links once they've built enough enough Likes for the page. Others use aggregate websites to sell their "black marketing" talents -- they're freelance spam-creators.

It's bad enough to know people are making so much cash from this site-sullying practice, but the competition for profits really makes folks sink to despicable levels. Example: the research team actually found somebody who was selling a page dedicated to the memory of the victims of the Boston terrorist attack for $1,000.

As for Facebook, they say protecting its users is a "top priority," and they have a number of systems in place to identify potentially harmful links:

In the meantime, we have been blocking people from clicking through the links and have reported the bad browser extensions to the appropriate parties. We believe only a small percentage of our users were affected by this issue, and we are currently working with them to ensure that they've removed the bad browser extension. We will keep improving our systems to ensure that people continue to have a safe experience on Facebook.

They can keep trying, but as long as spammers are being rewarded so handsomely for their enterprising content creation and crummy links, they'll keep coming back.

Did you have any idea Facebook spammers could make this much money per year?

Image via spanishalex/Flickr

Click the "Like" button below to get Linda Sharps's stories on Facebook. Linda Sharps ABOUT THE AUTHOR Linda Sharps

lives in Eugene, Oregon with her family, where she works from home while wrangling two rambunctious boys. She always has a caffeinated beverage in hand and a LEGO embedded in her foot.

More
?
reacties | | Read More...

Putting Your Baby on Facebook Within an Hour of Being Born Is a MUST

Penulis : Unknown on dinsdag 27 augustus 2013 | 15:17

dinsdag 27 augustus 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Mary Fischer 2 hours ago

newborn feetIt's no big secret that social media has kind of taken over our culture in every way possible. That's why it probably won't come as a shock to hear that most babies make their Facebook debut within an hour of being born.

The website www.posterista.co.uk polled 2,367 parents of kids ages 5 and under and asked them how soon their newborn's image was posted to one of their social media platforms after birth. The average time came in at 57.9 minutes, and not surprisingly, Facebook was the place where photos were shared the most, with Instagram and Flickr coming in second and third.

Huh, 57.9 minutes? I'm actually kind of shocked the average time is that long, considering how glued we are to our smartphones.

And I know there are plenty of moms and dads who are cautious about posting pictures online of their kids, but I honestly think that sharing baby's photos via Facebook is a good thing for new parents.

OMG. Do you know what I would've done for a Facebook account back when I had my son seven years ago? We were living out in Denver at the time of his birth, and all of our family and friends were back on the east coast. And that meant that on and around the day that he arrived, we were bombarded with phone call after phone call and email after email wanting to hear the scoop and/or obtain photos. To say it got pretty annoying and tedious is a major understatement.

I mean, we appreciated the fact that everyone was taking an interest in our son and it was understandable that they wanted to hear all the details on his birth. But considering how emotionally and physically exhausted we were, we groaned pretty much every time the phone rang or we opened our inboxes.

It would've been so nice to quickly upload photos and share them with everyone with one simple click. Maybe we actually would've had the much needed peace and quiet we were craving during that time.

If I could offer one piece of advice to today's new parents, I'd say SHARE AWAY when it comes to posting your baby's photos to Facebook, Instagram, whatever. You're not only doing yourselves a favor by gaining a little more time to bond with your newborn -- you're also making everyone who loves and cares about you absolutely thrilled in a matter of a few seconds. See? You can't get more of a win-win situation than that.

How long did you wait before sharing your baby's photos online?

Image via jencu/Flickr

Mary Fischer ABOUT THE AUTHOR Mary Fischer

is the writer behind The Mommyologist, and the mom of a future famous comedian. Her current loves include cosmopolitans, reality TV, and shoes that don't pinch her feet.

More
?
reacties | | Read More...

¿Eres demasiado en Facebook? Este nuevo proyecto podría sorprenderte

Penulis : Unknown on zondag 25 augustus 2013 | 14:26

zondag 25 augustus 2013

To is invalid
Parameter name: to
por John Biggs en tecnología hace 2 horas

 

Dos investigadores del MIT han creado la aplicación final anti-Facebook: un teclado que te sorprende cuando intenta iniciar sesión en el popular sitio de redes sociales.

Diseñado por Richard R. Morris y Dan McDuff, la aplicación se conecta al ordenador y mira lo que haces en tu navegador. Cuando detecta que estás en Facebook, tienes un shock.

Se llama Pavlov Poke. Sí, eso Pavlov.

La pareja creada un vídeo detallando su proyecto. Lo construyeron cuando el observado que ambos pasaron más de 50 horas en Facebook a la semana, por lo que es un culpable placer que se había convertido en una adicción.

"Mientras que este proyecto pretende ser una broma, creemos que es necesario un debate serio sobre cómo están diseñadas las tecnologías de comunicación,", dijo Morris. Ve a Facebook como siendo tan adictivo como cigarrillos.

¿Funcionó?

"No estamos seguros. Para ser verdaderamente eficaz, probablemente se necesitan muchas exposiciones de choque. Deben seguirse procedimientos de acondicionamiento adecuado. Lamentablemente, encontramos los choques tan aversiva, retiramos el dispositivo muy rápidamente después de instalarla. Como anécdota, sin embargo, me di cuenta una reducción significativa, aunque temporal, en mi uso de Facebook,", dijo Morris.

Lamentablemente no podemos comprar un Poke Pavlov por nosotros mismos, pero puedes construir uno mismo si tanto le gusta. Si tienes miedo de los choques, los investigadores también construidos un sistema que hace que una persona real llamar a tu teléfono y te poseen para llegar a Facebook. Es la tecnología.

¿Qué sentiste alguna vez algo que necesitaban este extremo para frenar el uso de Facebook?


?
reacties | | Read More...

7 Ways to Keep Facebook From Driving You Crazy

Penulis : Unknown on maandag 19 augustus 2013 | 17:58

maandag 19 augustus 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Nicole Fabian-Weber 4 hours ago

facebookFacebook makes you happier, smarter, and more at one with the real world. Just kidding. It makes you depressed, dumber, and is super isolating. Another study has found that, duh, Facebook makes you sad. But we already know that, so no need to dwell. Let's focus on another interesting thing the study found. People tend to spend a decent chunk of time looking at the Facebook pages of people they don't like -- "frenemies and exes", to be exact. Why, right? Seems kind of masochistic and like a terrible use of social media.

Let's stop the madness, you guys. What do you say? Let's, for once and for all, learn to use Facebook in a healthy way with these 7 tips!

Or, you know, just quit.

1. Don't be friends with people you haven't had physical contact with in two years or less. Have your friends on Facebook be people you're actually friends with. You know, people you care about and who care about you. If you spend your time looking up what Joe Schmo from high school is up to, really, what did you do all day?

2. Only be friends with people you actually like. I understand the concept of stalking people you don't like -- girls who made your life a living hell in grade school; some jerkface you used to work with, but ... what is the point? What good comes out of that? It's a waste of perfectly good time and energy. You could be ... knitting instead.

3. Don't be friends with exes!!! Bad, bad, bad idea. Just bad.

4. Limit your Facebook checking to once a day. Once you go upward of three Facebook checks a day, it's bordering on obsession. Tell yourself you can check once and then call it.

5. Don't have Facebook on your phone. It's one of the reasons you check it so often! You're bored in line at the store, so what do you do? Check Facebook! Stop! If you just have it on your computer, you won't be on it as frequently.

6. Don't be the person who posts super personal things. Facebook is a social media site, it's not a therapy session. Having people you're not very close with know all sorts of personal info about your life isn't healthy. Like, at all.

7. Don't stare at other people's photos and convince yourself that that's how their life is. Because it's not. They're only posting their greatest hits. Trust me.

What do you have to add?

Image via stitchohana/Flickr


?
reacties | | Read More...

Facebook Wedding Photo Busts a Clueless Tax Cheat

Penulis : Unknown on vrijdag 16 augustus 2013 | 11:33

vrijdag 16 augustus 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Linda Sharps 17 hours ago

If you've read one story about how someone posted something they shouldn't have on Facebook, you probably think you've read them all. At least that's what I tend to think -- like, how can someone possibly outdo the stupidest Facebook blunders we've already heard about? Somehow, though, these stories keep rolling in, and each one is a little crazier than the last.

Take the recent example of a 45-year-old British man named Heath Joynson, who collected over $1,500 worth of taxpayers' money through housing and council tax handouts on the basis that he was single and living alone. The only teeny, tiny problem with poor lonely Mr. Joynson's self-described status as a struggling bachelor who needed public assistance to get by? The WEDDING PHOTO he posted on Facebook.

*facebookpalm*

It seems Joynson came under investigation in 2011 after housing officers heard that despite his claims of being single, he was actually married and living with a wife. Fraud investigators began looking at Joynson's social networking profiles, where they immediately discovered a photo of the happy couple smiling as they signed their marriage register.

Sadly, husband and wife eventually separated due to Joynson's alleged heroin use, but not before Joynson pleaded guilty to failing to notify a change of circumstances affecting his entitlement to benefits between September 20, 2010 and January 9, 2011.

According to a city council spokesperson,

The offender tried a host of tricks and lies to avoid his responsibilities. But our determined investigation team found pictures of his marriage ceremony on his wife’s Facebook page. Now he is paying the price of deception and we are sending out a strong message that we will piece together information from a range of sources and expose people who are defrauding the public purse.

Honestly, I am never going to stop being amazed at how clueless people can be with social media. This is as idiotic as the deadbeat dad who weaseled his way out of paying child support for his three kids, but posted a Facebook photo of himself gleefully lying on a pile of cash. People are getting busted by Facebook all the time -- for cheating on their spouses, calling in sick to work, committing crimes, and in one particularly ridiculous case, forgetting to log out after breaking into someone's house, stealing her jewelry, and using her computer to check his status.

I'm not sure if this Joynson guy figured his account was off-limits to investigators or if he just never even considered the possible downsides of sharing his wedding photo when he was collecting cash for being single, but he's now officially part of a not-so-elite club of Facebook Fools. Let his bad choices be a warning to us all.

Why do you think people keep getting busted for things they share on Facebook?

Image via adamjonfuller/Flickr

Click the "Like" button below to get Linda Sharps's stories on Facebook. Linda Sharps ABOUT THE AUTHOR Linda Sharps

lives in Eugene, Oregon with her family, where she works from home while wrangling two rambunctious boys. She always has a caffeinated beverage in hand and a LEGO embedded in her foot.

More
?
reacties | | Read More...

Hombre Posts espeluznante foto de su esposa muerta en Facebook antes de confesar haber matado a su (VIDEO)

Penulis : Unknown on vrijdag 9 augustus 2013 | 06:27

vrijdag 9 augustus 2013

To is invalid
Parameter name: to
por Julie Ryan Evans hace 10 horas

Derek MedinaHemos visto gente un montón de cosas locas post en Facebook, pero un hombre de Miami publicado algo hoy que era aterrorizante y absolutamente criminal. Según el Miami Herald, Derek Medina, 31, publicó una foto de su esposa, Jennifer Alfonso, 26, después de que presuntamente disparó y mató. Luego condujo a la comisaría y entregó libremente.

Policía corrió a su casa y encontró el cuerpo de Alfonso. También encontraron a su hija de 10 años allí ilesa. El mensaje que publicó en Facebook (que desde entonces ha sido eliminado) es escalofriante y ofrece lo que se supone que es una explicación para su comportamiento brutal.

Mi esposa fue golpearme y no voy a soportar más con el abuso, así que hice lo que hice. Espero que me entiendas. Voy a pena de prisión o la muerte para matar a mi esposa. Os quiero. Los extraño. Cuídate. Gente de Facebook me verás en las noticias.

¿Te imaginas leer eso en tu Facebook feed? ¿Luego viendo el cuadro espantoso (con el título «Rip Jennifer Alfonso»), que al parecer mostró su tirada en el piso de su cocina con "sus piernas doblan en un ángulo incómodo" y su "brazo izquierdo y mejilla izquierda son sangrientas"? No sé cuánto tiempo fue entre el momento en que publicó las fotos y llegó a la estación de policía, pero es difícil de creer que nadie llamó a la policía antes de que él llegó allí.

Cuando pensamos en alguien tan loco como para matar a alguien o lo suficientemente enojado tendemos a pensar de ellos haciéndolo en un ataque de rabia, cuando ellos no están pensando claramente. Pensar que este hombre tomó el tiempo para publicar en Facebook después de presuntamente matar a la mujer que amaba es incomprensible, y es aterrador pensar que gente como esta existen.

¿Qué harías si recibes un mensaje como éste en Facebook?

Imagen vía CBS

Julie Ryan Evans Sobre el autorJulie Ryan Evans

puede encontrar escribiendo desde cafés donde quiera que estén. La calidad de sus días es ampliamente influenciada por el asiento que atrapó y si un plato de proteína está disponible.

Más
?
reacties | | Read More...

3-Year-Old's Tragic Drowning Is Why Babysitters Need Rules About Texting and Facebook

Penulis : Unknown on donderdag 8 augustus 2013 | 14:48

donderdag 8 augustus 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Nicole Fabian-Weber 3 hours ago

poolIt's every mom's worst nightmare. She leaves her child in the care of a babysitter and something happens. Something bad. Whether it's a bump on the head or something much worse, no parent wants to be notified that something happened to their kid on the sitter's watch. Especially if it's something that can't be undone. And especially if it could have easily been avoided.

A 3-year-old girl drowned in a pool recently while a babysitter was supposed to be looking after her. I say "supposed to be" because while the child was playing in the pool, the babysitter was checking Facebook on her phone a few feet away.

Kariasa Thomas, 37, was left in charge of looking after her best friend's four children. The youngest child, Kanyce, didn't know how to swim, but Kariasa let her use the pool anyway. Kariasa reportedly told the girl, who wasn't wearing any flotation devices, to stand on the steps of the pool while her siblings swam. During this time, Thomas proceeded to look at Facebook and play with her pet pit bull for 15 minutes while the kids were in the pool unsupervised. She's been arrested and charged with reckless injury to a child.

If these accusations are true, this is a case in which, well, this woman is a careless moron who should have never been watching a child. But it begs an interesting question for parents who use childcare: Do you have to tell your babysitter to not use their phone?

I, personally, think that being on your smartphone while you're being paid to watch a child is totally unacceptable. If the kid is taking a nap and the sitter wants to peruse Facebook or check their email, fine. But when kids are up and require supervision, absolutely not. Not only is it totally irresponsible, this person is being paid for their services. Lawyers don't sit at their desks, checking Instagram. Waitresses don't send out emails when they're taking people's orders. Getting lost in your phone should be done on your time. Not when you're collecting money from someone else. And especially not when you're watching kids.

It's sad, but I kind of feel like parents really need to reiterate this to people who are going to be watching their children. Stories like this, sadly, are a reminder that a simple message of "Please, no phone while taking care of my child" is in order when leaving our kids with sitters -- even if they're sitters we know and love. It seems obvious, but you never know. Although, not sure it would have made a difference in the case of Kariasa Thomas. Anyone who leaves children who can't swim unattended in a pool needs a lot more than a reminder message.

Thoughts and prayers to Kanyce's family.

Do you remind your sitter to not check their phone?

Image via Don Cornelius/Flickr


?
reacties | | Read More...

Facebook se está convirtiendo en la reina del Drama en tu matrimonio por el acecho

Penulis : Unknown on dinsdag 6 augustus 2013 | 16:51

dinsdag 6 augustus 2013

To is invalid
Parameter name: to
por Nicole Fabian-Weber hace 1 hora

heart phoneRecientemente, un estudio concluyó las parejas que están en Facebook son más propensos a hacer trampa. Duh. Aunque no creo que un doctorado fue necesario acudir a esta conclusión, el estudio, que cubre como Facebook se ha convertido en "el tercero en discordia en las relaciones," revelan un poco más interesantes piezas de información. Es decir, el hecho de que cyber-espiando a tu compañero, o como él se ha refiere a "vigilancia de la pareja," sólo conduce a cosas malas.

Nota: No necesariamente malos resultados (AKA, él puede no ser infiel), pero las cosas malas (AKA, vas a ti mismo en una nerviosidad todo lo malinterpretando puedes ver en línea).

Así que deja ya.

Soy un gran creyente en no espiando, acechando/espiar a la persona que usted está interesado en línea en o involucrados con. Sé que es tentador, ya que todo está a nuestro alcance (literalmente), pero no siempre vas a encontrar algo malo. Y a veces, la gente no se detendrá hasta que, de hecho, encontrar algo malo. Como en a prácticamente inventan algo si es necesario.

Por supuesto hay sombra gente que hace cosas sombrías, y allí muy bien podría ser algo legítimamente "no cool" sobre la persona que está involucrado en algún lugar en Internet. Pero al mismo tiempo, nada puede malinterpretarse en línea. Un simple intercambio entre un tipo que sólo empezamos a salir y una chica guapa en Facebook no significa que está saliendo con ella. Podría ser un viejo amigo o incluso un primo. Pero no vas a ver, o ni siquiera quiere ver, cuando estás husmeando. Sería muy diferente si los dos salieron y ustedes nos topamos dijo chica. Conseguirías respuestas enseguida.En línea, lo único que va a pasar es drama.

La gente no es tan mala. El Internet hace que a veces lo parezca. Si realmente crees que hay algo "off" con alguien que sales, adelante. Snoop lejos. Pero en última instancia, ¿qué va a pasar es que Facebook va a causar más problemas en su relación que estaría allí. ¿Así que... tal vez cerrar la sesión? Lo hice, y puedo atestiguar que el hecho de que es en realidad bastante liberador.

¿Siempre tienes una pelea con alguien sobre algo en Facebook?

Imagen via joshwept/Flickr


?
reacties | | Read More...

Facebook Ads You Have to Watch Will Have People Dropping Like Flies

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Nicole Fabian-Weber 14 hours ago

thumbs downI know there are tons of great things about Facebook -- it helps people keep in touch with those they love who are far away, etc. -- but let's be honest here, there are also a lot of annoying things about it. In fact, it seems like the more time that goes on, the more annoying Facebook gets. And I'm not talking about the users here. I'm talking about Facebook itself. The privacy issues that we can never quite get a clear answer on; the constant changing of format (and having to reset privacy settings); and now the video ads.

There's talk that video ads may be making their way to Facebook some time in the near future. Video ads you can't skip. Video ads you have to watch if you want to see photos of your friend's dinner or cousin's baby.

Not cool, Facebook, not cool at all.

To me, there are few things more annoying about the Internet than video ads you can't skip. They do it on YouTube all the time, and other random sites, but there's something ... I don't know ... a little different about doing it on Facebook.

Facebook is personal. Your Facebook feed is made up of your friends and family members. You created it. Something seems wrong about having to sit through an annoying video ad in order to see what the people in your life are up to.

I understand why unskippable video ads online exist from an advertiser's standpoint -- everyone fast-forwards through their commercials on their DVRs -- but from a Facebook standpoint, I think it's a really bad idea. I'm sure Zuckerberg et al. will rake in a ton o' cash from video ads, but I honestly think that this could be the beginning of the end for Facebook.

I was talking to someone over the weekend when the subject of this was brought up. She said, "Oh, I'd definitely leave Facebook if I had to watch a video every time I logged on. I check it when I'm in line at the grocery store!" And I think most will have the same mentality. Why spend 30 seconds of the minute you have to look through your feed on an obnoxious video ad? No thanks. It kind of defeats the point of site altogether. There isn't anything remotely personal about a video ad smack dab in the middle of your newsfeed.

What do you think of video ads on Facebook?

Image via gordontarpley/Flickr


?
reacties | | Read More...

Man Arrested for ‘Dining and Dashing’ After Facebook Shaming Is Lucky He Wasn’t Punished More Severely

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Adriana Velez 14 hours ago

saul zelaznogRemember Mr. Dine and Dash, the guy who got called out on Facebook for skipping out on his restaurant bill? The restaurant, Brewster's Cabinet, asked their fans to call Reno police if they happened to spot the man in the photo they posted. Well, you will be pleased to hear that the accused dasher, Saul Zelaznog, has been arrested -- and it turns out Brewster's Cabinet wasn't the only place in town he'd stiffed.

Zelaznog (or Gonzalez, as he calls himself when it's not backwards name day) was technically arrested for a probation violation, though he may have to answer for skipping out on his bill in restaurants throughout Reno. Which he can explain! He just forgot his wallet. Multiple times.

In general I'm a little squeamish over the whole idea of shaming restaurant customers and workers via social media. I think it can go terribly wrong. People can be falsely accused, restaurant workers can get fired, restaurants can get death threats -- it can backfire. What about all the cheap tippers who crop up on Reddit all the time? Sometimes justice is served. And Zelaznog is innocent until proven guilty. But if all these accusations are true, then it's about time Gonzalezelaznog or whatever his name is took some responsibility for his careless actions. I mean, if you're not going to be super creative about skipping out on your restaurant bill, like these daring diners who jumped 55 stories, we need to come up with something. Here's a few ideas.

Wash all the dishes every night for a year.
Buy all the diners' dinner one night at each restaurant.
Literally sing for his supper -- take requests from customers and seranade everyone.
Wear a sign reading "I skipped out on my bill here" in front of each restaurant he stiffed.
Spend 100 hours of service in a soup kitchen.
Write apology notes to every single worker affected by his non-payments.

Do you think restaurant customers should get shamed via Facebook or Twitter?

Image via Brewster's Cabinet/Facebook

Adriana Velez ABOUT THE AUTHOR Adriana Velez

is a staff writer who dabbles in food, parenting, news, entertainment, molecular biology, and anything else that that pops into her head. She lives with her elementary school-aged son in Brooklyn, land of urban farms and artisan everything.  

More
?
reacties | | Read More...

Man Arrested for ‘Dining and Dashing’ After Facebook Shaming Is Lucky He Wasn’t Punished More Severely

Penulis : Unknown on maandag 5 augustus 2013 | 21:37

maandag 5 augustus 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Adriana Velez 5 hours ago

saul zelaznogRemember Mr. Dine and Dash, the guy who got called out on Facebook for skipping out on his restaurant bill? The restaurant, Brewster's Cabinet, asked their fans to call Reno police if they happened to spot the man in the photo they posted. Well, you will be pleased to hear that the accused dasher, Saul Zelaznog, has been arrested -- and it turns out Brewster's Cabinet wasn't the only place in town he'd stiffed.

Zelaznog was technically arrested for a probation violation, though he may have to answer for skipping out on his bill in restaurants throughout Reno. Which he can explain! Here's what Zelaznog has to say for himself.

In reference to the most recent incident at Brewster's, he claims he forgot to bring his wallet, but that he planned to pay that bill eventually, really he did. And that one time he skipped out on another restaurant bill? He totally left his watch as collateral. "I'm not trying to burn bridges around town," Zelaznog says. Yeah, funny thing, 'cause that's exactly what you're doing here. "This is a small little town," he added, as if this just occurred to him. WHY YES, IT IS, ISN'T IT, say all the restaurant owners and employers he's pissed off.

Of course, Zelaznog (or "Gonzalez," as he sometimes calls himself -- he can figure out how to spell his last name backwards, but he can't seem to remember his wallet, ever?) is innocent until proven guilty. But he does seem to have quite the following in Reno. If all these accusations are true, then it's about time Gonzalezelaznog or whatever his name is took some responsibility for his careless actions.

Profit margins at restaurants are notoriously slim. And restaurant workers work incredibly hard. No one gets a free ride, not if the rest of the honest patrons are paying their share. Saul is lucky he's not getting run out of town on a rail, old wild west-style.

In general I'm a little squeamish over the whole idea of shaming restaurant customers and workers via social media. I think it can go terribly wrong. People can be falsely accused, restaurant workers can get fired, restaurants can get death threats -- it can backfire. But sometimes justice is served. I don't know ... are all those other mistakes and slights worth catching this one guy? Maybe, maybe not.

Do you think restaurant customers should get shamed via Facebook or Twitter?

Image via Brewster's Cabinet/Facebook

Adriana Velez ABOUT THE AUTHOR Adriana Velez

is a staff writer who dabbles in food, parenting, news, entertainment, molecular biology, and anything else that that pops into her head. She lives with her elementary school-aged son in Brooklyn, land of urban farms and artisan everything.  

More
?
reacties | | Read More...

Restaurant Customer Known for Eating Without Paying Gets What He Deserves on Facebook

Penulis : Unknown on zaterdag 3 augustus 2013 | 08:32

zaterdag 3 augustus 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Kiri Blakeley 18 hours ago

Dine and dash just isn't what it used to be! These days, the power of social media can be harnessed to shame your ass into paying your bill! That's what one restaurant is attempting by publishing a photo of a guy on their Facebook page who they say dined and dashed in their establishment. Brewer's Cabinet brewpub in Reno, Nevada posted a photo of the guy (which a waiter managed to snap) and wrote on their Facebook page:

ATTN RENO: If you know, or see, this dude, please call RENO POLICE DEPT at 334-2121 immediately, and then remind him that his tab at The Brewer's Cabinet is still waiting to be paid. And, while you're at it, you could tell him that visiting restaurants/bars with your friends, running up a huge bill, roughing up servers and then bailing is pretty uncool ... pathetic, really. Get a life, man.

Yikes, and it turns out this wasn't the only restaurant the "dude" had stiffed!

At least three other establishments reportedly confirmed that the dasher, named Saul Zelaznog, had run out on his check there too. Bartenders say that Zelaznog's modus operandi includes running up a tab, then claiming he doesn't have his wallet, dashing, and never coming back to pay up!

A manager at Campo, another place Zelaznog apparently stiffed, says:

Ya know, it's really unfortunate that we put faith in people and they don't always pull through and it makes it harder for us to trust everyone else.

Sheesh, no wonder so many places now ask for a credit card upfront!

But the alleged dasher denies the claims, telling the Reno Gazette Journal that he simply forgot a "method of payment" at one establishment but was going to be back to pay later. Err, guess he forgot that too? Considering they called the cops. And when he forgot his method of paying at yet another place -- gee, this happens to him a lot -- he left a "nice watch" as collateral. Dude, no one wants your watch.

He also says he is asking his family to wire him money to pay off his restaurant debt. Bet they're overjoyed.

Meanwhile, Mr. Forgot My Wallet was arrested yesterday for a probation violation and put in the clink.

Well, at least he'll get free meals in jail.

Have you ever had anyone dine and dash on you?

Image via JoeShlabotnik/Flickr


?
reacties | | Read More...

The 'Funny' People You Know on Facebook May Not Be So Funny After All

Penulis : Unknown on donderdag 1 augustus 2013 | 17:56

donderdag 1 augustus 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Nicole Fabian-Weber 1 hour ago

thumbs downA weird, little experiment that was just conducted concluded that people can tell (or surmise, at least) whether or not you're funny by looking at your Facebook profile. Out of 53 cues analyzed, the things most likely to give people an idea of what your humor (or lack thereof) is like were: Your profile pictures (whether they're amusing and if your friends seem like a good group to get a drink with); your status updates (whether they were funny and non-political); and your wall activity (how many likes you have and whether or not people comment up a storm on your shit).

And to that I say, really? People think there's a correlation between having a lot of Internet friends and being funny?

Some things are funnier online (cats, for instance), but at the end of the day, if you're funny, you're funny. No amount of Facebook likes or carefully-crafted profile photos featuring you with a propeller hat are going to change that. And I think, I hope, people know that. I know some really unfunny, kind of douchey, people who have tons of friends on Facebook. And they immediately have a bajillion likes on anything they post. I actually saw a post that was just a photo of a glass of Sprite the other day that had 47 likes. True story.

Perhaps seeing the profile of someone who has a lot of friends and posts a lot of photos of him or herself doing cool things makes them seem like a fun person. Someone you'd like to hang out with. But funny? No. I think status updates and tweets are a pretty good barometer of how funny a person is. A person I follow on Twitter wrote, "I think the pope just came out" after Pope Francis said "who am I to judge" homosexuals; and then "Kale can go f*ck itself" a short while later. That's funny. And he doesn't have a lot of online friends. So, study, y'burnt.

Can you tell if someone is funny by looking at their Facebook post?

Image via comedy_nose/Flickr


?
reacties | | Read More...

‘Facebook Cheating’ Is Just as Painful as the Real Thing -- But Should It Be?

Penulis : Unknown on maandag 29 juli 2013 | 12:23

maandag 29 juli 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Nicole Fabian-Weber 46 minutes ago

cheatingNo doubt, infidelity has been on the rise since social media has sunk its claws into the otherwise somewhat content world. We now pretty much have access to anyone, any time we want. And let's not forget, things are so much easier to say -- whether they're filled with hate or filled with lust -- when you're sitting behind a computer and don't have to face an actual human being. But should "Facebook cheating," i.e., exchanging sexy messages, etc., online -- and online only -- be just as upsetting as the real thing?

Turns out, most people think so.

A new study shows that couples who discover online acts of infidelity are just as upset as if they realized their partner was cheating in real life. Research conducted by Texas Tech University concluded that, although the stages of coping with online cheating are different, the infidelity itself creates a similar emotional experience for the person who was cheated on. Jaclyn Cravens, one of the lead authors of the study, said: "This is very important because there is a line of thought that if the infidelity was discovered online, or confined to online activity, then it shouldn't be as painful."

I can't imagine what it would be like to discover something as awful as this. It would, without question, be incredibly painful and feel like a punch to the gut. But I can't help but wonder if the relationships in which the cheating was solely restricted to the Internet are more salvageable than the ones where actual, physical contact is made.

By no means am I diminishing "Facebook cheating." Like I said, I'm sure it's absolutely devastating. But the truth is, online, people are completely different people. Clearly, one's "online persona" is a part of them (that may or may not lie dormant) if they have the ability to act a certain way -- but is it the "real" them? And isn't the web, for some, just a really bad way to deal with real life problems they have? For instance, trolls probably aren't as big of assholes in real life, but they're probably not very nice or happy people. Am I making any sense?

I guess this is just another interesting and sad layer that's been added to society, compliments of social media. I certainly don't condone or would want to be on the receiving end of "online infidelity," but maybe the sum is bigger than its parts? Maybe the problem is social media? Maybe people should ... get the hell offline for a while.

Would you be as upset if you found out your partner was "Facebook cheating"?

Image via denharsh/Flickr


?
reacties | | Read More...

7 Controversial Facebook Pics No One Wants to See (PHOTOS)

Penulis : Unknown on woensdag 24 juli 2013 | 16:36

woensdag 24 juli 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Sasha Brown-Worsham 3 hours ago

photos on FacebookAh, Facebook. The place where our "friends" come to judge us and hate on our photos and laugh at us behind our backs. I have such a love/hate relationship with the social networking site. On the one hand, it can bring connections that change our lives. On the other, it can cause anger, confusion, and eye rolling so intense, we practically strain our eyes.

Certain photos, in particular, seem to bring out the Facebook rage. These range from innocent baby photos to obnoxious bikini ones and everything in between. It does seem that certain photos are just almost universally panned by many in our viewing "audience." This does not mean stop posting them. It just means be aware that when you do, you are likely annoying someone.

Here are the seven most annoying Facebook photos that make some people hit "hide" and still others hit "unfriend." See below:

What photos annoy you on Facebook?

var UGC_HOST = "http://ugc-01.cafemomstatic.com";var current_slide_num = 0;var slideshow_url = "http://thestir.cafemom.com/technology/158734/7_controversial_facebook_pics_no";var short_url = "/technology/158734/7_controversial_facebook_pics_no";var slide_id = "";var from_social = "";var current_slide_id = '108985';Sasha Brown-Worsham ABOUT THE AUTHOR Sasha Brown-Worsham

can't decide whether she is a mother, writer, or runner, but is usually all three at some point each day. She has written for dozens of print magazines, newspapers, and websites. She rarely ever writes on bathroom walls.

More
?
reacties | | Read More...
 
| Powered by Bulikpost |