News Update :
Mogelijk gemaakt door Blogger.
Posts tonen met het label Might. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label Might. Alle posts tonen

E-Cigarettes Might Be Just as Bad for You as Real Cigarettes

Penulis : Unknown on woensdag 28 augustus 2013 | 16:47

woensdag 28 augustus 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Kiri Blakeley 1 hour ago

Cigarettes are one of the worst things on the planet for your health, as everyone knows, but they are also one of the most addictive. Quitting them is about as difficult as quitting heroin. So the electronic cigarette looked to be some kind of miracle for cigarette smokers. But a new study says that the e-cigs could be just as harmful as real cigs. OMG, what? Now I'm worried for all of my friends who have been sucking on these things like they're chia seed sticks!

The new study says that e-cigarettes contain carcinogenic chemicals that can make them as dangerous as tobacco cigarettes. E-cigs are even being banned in public places in France. Sheesh, and the French love their cigs so this must be serious.

Right now, electronic cigarettes are still legal in public places in the United States. That might not last for long. Damn, what's a person to do who wants a cig?!

Anyway, I'm totally shocked by this because they really were marketed as the cigarette smoker's dream. You could get that smokers' fix without damaging your health. But you know what they say about things that seem to good to be true.

A French magazine ran tests on the cigarettes and found:

We detected a significant quantity of carcinogenic molecules in the vapour of these cigarettes which have thus far gone undetected. In three models out of ten the levels of the carcinogenic compound formaldehyde come close to those of a conventional cigarette. The highly toxic molecule acrolein was also detected in the vapours of e-cigarettes, sometimes at levels even higher than in traditional cigarettes.

There is some good news, though. A health expert in France said that the e-cigs were still a good alternative for heavy smokers. He said that it was at least better than smoking regular cigs.

But we all know the best thing to do is quit.

Personally, I think cigarettes should just be banned entirely. Why are we selling cancer and all kinds of other health problems in a box? I don't care that there are warnings about it -- lots of people who smoke grew up without those warnings (in fact, magazines from the '40s and '50s often marketed cigarettes as the cure for sore throats!). They got addicted and now they're stuck. It's like the same thing is happening with e-cigs. I just looked up an ad for an electronic cigarette that touts it as "the 100 percent healthy way to smoke"!

Of course, it wouldn't be right to legally get people addicted to cigarettes and then suddenly make it illegal and those people who desperately need a fix end up in jail for buying some black market smokes. But something needs to be done because the health care costs associated with cigarettes are outrageous -- not to mention that people are dying!

I guess it's back to the nicotine gum for everyone trying to quit.

Have you tried the electronic cigarettes? Have you tried to quit smoking?

Image via Paulio!/Flickr

Click "Like" if you wear a pink ribbon.
?
reacties | | Read More...

Kim Kardashian's Famous Butt Might Be Thanks to Plastic Surgery -- Are You Really Surprised?

Penulis : Unknown on donderdag 22 augustus 2013 | 14:35

donderdag 22 augustus 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Emily Abbate 3 hours ago

Kim KardashianIt's been one of the biggest mysteries in all of Hollywood: Is Kim Kardashian's butt the REAL deal? The Dash doll tried to prove her derriere's authenticity on an episode of Keeping Up With the Kardashians, even going as far as getting her butt x-rayed. When the results showed no sign of an implant, I personally was convinced and astonished by the laws of nature that Kim's backside was 100 percent Kardashian genes. Now, a source is saying that we may have all been fooled.

A source told Life & Style Magazine that Kim had fat injected into her butt after receiving liposuction on her legs, and that's why the extra oomph didn't show up on her infamous x-ray. A doctor added that Kim may even have an implant that doesn't show up on an x-ray -- one which the world may never know about.

Alright y'all, so Kim's backside may not be all her own. But honestly, what's the big deal?

Whether or not Kim had fat injections into her but, she's entitled. I mean, think about all of the celebrities, especially reality TV stars, who have Botox, breast implants, or other work done all of the time. These procedures, they're all elective. These stars are choosing to change their appearance, and if that's what they want, then so be it.

Of course Kim is going to claim her butt all-natural. It's something uniquely hers and she's known for it! You know what? That's just fine. Kim doesn't owe any of us anything. Her butt is part of her brand. Personally, I think we all need to spend less time worrying about whether or not Kim had work done on her backside, and use our time for better purposes. You know, like contemplating what work Amanda Bynes has actually had done. Now THAT is a mystery.

Do you think Kim Kardashian's butt is 100 percent real?

Image via kimkardashian/Instagram

Click the "Like" button below if you're Krazy for the Kardashians!
?
reacties | | Read More...

Horrifying Impact of Texting and Driving Shown in Heartbreaking New Film Might Stop It for Good (VIDEO)

Penulis : Unknown on woensdag 21 augustus 2013 | 16:16

woensdag 21 augustus 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Nicole Fabian-Weber 5 hours ago

texting and drivingIt truly is shocking that people still text and drive. Despite the fact that there are about 1.6 million accidents caused by texting and driving every year, and that "driving while intexticated" is considered six times worse than driving drunk, people still do it. Why? Do they really think that a life-changing car accident, or death, will never happen to or by them? Do they think that responding "LOL" to some meaningless and trivial thing a friend wrote to them is more important than their safety or the safety of others? Many do, which, sadly, is why every day there are about 11 teen deaths from texting and driving.

It needs to stop.

Famed film maker, Werner Herzog, deviated from his standard art house fare to create what essentially is a 35-minute PSA on the dangers of texting and driving. The documentary is called From One Second to the Next and it looks at the lives of people who have been affected by this terribly pervasive habit. A mom who lost all traces of the vibrant, rambunctious child she once knew. A regular guy who killed three people by sending the message "I love you" to his wife. And a man who decided that "texting and driving was more important to him than two men were to their families."

If you do one thing today, please watch this video and then pass it along to anyone you can. The film is hard to swallow, but hopefully its gut-wrenching rawness will prevent people from ever texting and driving again. It will cost you nothing, and hopefully it will prevent costing someone's life.

For more information on how you can prevent texting and driving, visit stoptextwrecks.org.

"Things can happen so quick that they'll change your life forever."

Do you ever text and drive?

Image via ShareATT/YouTube


?
reacties | | Read More...

Jennifer Aniston Might deja dinero antes de que empiece a arruinar su segundo matrimonio

Penulis : Unknown on dinsdag 20 augustus 2013 | 02:29

dinsdag 20 augustus 2013

To is invalid
Parameter name: to
por Ericka Sóuter hace 10 horas

jennifer anistonJennifer Aniston puede dirigirse a heartbreak todo otra vez. No siempre ha tenido suerte en el Departamento de romance. Su matrimonio con Brad Pitt famosamente se estrelló e incendió después se enamoró de su señor y la señora Smith costar Angelina Jolie. Sin embargo, los aficionados esperábamos que había encontrado en novio Justin Theroux. Pero si los informes más recientes son para ser creído, Jen está saboteando su propia relación y es un error que han hecho muchas otras mujeres.

Como muchas parejas, Jennifer y su marido que no veo a los ojos en un tema muy importante: dinero. Aparentemente, ella ama tratar a sí misma de prodigar, Escapadas, de compras, mientras que él es más práctico con el dinero de alto precio. Fuentes han dicho globo revista que cayó tanto como $15.000 en un armario de verano y ni siquiera llevaban muchas de las caras nuevas maneras--algo el más frugal Justin sólo puede entender.

Jen también al parecer tiene una inclinación para pasando estas juergas cuando ella está abajo o tuvo un mal día. Tantas mujeres pueden relacionarse con eso. Por supuesto, no caminamos en la puerta con una falda de $5.000, pero todos esos pares de zapatos, maquillaje y piezas de joyería se pueden sumar. Esa oleada emocional momentánea de terapia por menor no vale el daño a largo plazo que podemos hacer a nuestras cuentas bancarias, cuentas de crédito y en última instancia nuestras relaciones.

El estrés de posponer su boda ciertamente no ha ayudado. Ella supuestamente es golpear las tiendas aún más. Y sabiendo cómo Justin desaprueba, empezó escondiendo sus compras. Un gran no-no y uno de tantos de nosotros son culpables de.

Conflictos de dinero pueden destruir cualquier relación, incluso aquellos entre los ricos. Se reduce a confiar. Su cónyuge debe saber que puede confiar en usted para tomar decisiones racionales, inteligentes, especialmente cuando se trata de las finanzas. Incluso si usted tiene un montón de dinero en el banco, escandaloso gasto puede ser un signo de inmadurez. No es una manera inteligente o saludable para lidiar con sus emociones sobre una base regular. Y mantener este secreto antes de caminar por el pasillo es una locura. Todos, pero garantiza un viaje eventual a un consejero matrimonial o peor--al Tribunal de divorcio. Hope Jen acicala y guarda esa cartera.

¿Crees que problemas de dinero pueden arruinar cualquier relación?

Imagen via Splash

Haga clic en "Me gusta" Si amas a tu esposo! Ericka Sóuter Sobre el autor Ericka Sóuter

es un veterano pop cultura y celeb escritor de noticias. Que la experiencia se reduce a dos cosas: Sabe demasiado sobre las Kardashians y domina en Artes y entretenimiento preguntas del Trivial Pursuit.

Más
?
reacties | | Read More...

Jennifer Aniston Might Let Money Ruin Her Second Marriage Before It Starts

Penulis : Unknown on maandag 19 augustus 2013 | 17:55

maandag 19 augustus 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Ericka Sóuter 2 hours ago

jennifer anistonJennnifer Aniston may be headed for heartbreak all over again. She hasn't always been lucky in the romance department. Her marriage to Brad Pitt famously crashed and burned after he fell for his Mr. and Mrs. Smith costar Angelina Jolie. However, we fans had hoped she'd found The One in fiance Justin Theroux. But if the latest reports are to be believed, Jen is sabotaging her own relationship and it's a mistake many other woman have made.

Like many couples, Jennifer and her husband-to-be don't see eye-to-eye on one very important topic: money. Apparently, she loves to treat herself to lavish, high-priced shopping sprees, while he is more practical with money. Sources have told the Globe magazine that she dropped as much as $15,000 on a summer wardrobe and never even wore many of the pricey new fashions -- something the  more frugal Justin just can't understand.

Jen also reportedly has a penchant for going on these sprees when she is down or had a bad day. So many women can relate to that one. Of course, we don't walk in the door with a $5,000 skirt, but all those pairs of shoes, makeup, pieces of jewelry can add up. That momentary emotional surge we get from retail therapy is not worth the long term damage we may be doing to our bank accounts, credit scores, and ultimately our relationships.

The stress of postponing their wedding certainly hasn't helped matters. She's supposedly hitting the stores even more. And knowing how Justin disapproves, she has started hiding her purchases. A big, big No-No and one so many of us are guilty of.

Conflicts about money can destroy any relationship – even those among the rich. It boils down to trust. Your spouse needs to know that he can rely on you to make rational, smart choices, especially when it comes to finances. Even if you have a lot of money in the bank, outrageous spending can be a sign of immaturity. It is not a smart or healthy way to deal with your emotions on a regular basis. And to keep this secret before you walk down the aisle is crazy. It all but guarantees an eventual trip to a marriage counselor or worse – to divorce court. Hope Jen smartens up and puts that wallet away.

Do you think money problems can ruin any relationship?

Image via Splash

Click "Like" if you love your husband! Ericka Sóuter ABOUT THE AUTHOR Ericka Sóuter

is a veteran pop culture and celeb news writer. That experience boils down to two things: she knows way too much about the Kardashians and she dominates on Trivial Pursuit's arts and entertainment questions.

More
?
reacties | | Read More...

'DWTS' Season 17 Casting Rumors: Who Might Be In and Who’s Definitely Out?

Penulis : Unknown on donderdag 8 augustus 2013 | 15:11

donderdag 8 augustus 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Sasha Brown-Worsham 4 hours ago

DWTSSeason 17's cast of Dancing With the Stars is really anybody's guess at this point. We have all kinds of ideas about who may be on the show and who may not, but as of now, everything is a rumor. Nothing is confirmed. Somehow, this show always manages to keep such a tight lid on it all.

What we do know so far is that Paula Deen is more than likely out. The embattled southern chef was rumored to have been a top choice and certainly would have brought a whole lot of viewers to the ballroom, but Deen has reportedly turned them down, with a source saying, "The dance floor is not an appropriate forum for her."

Um, yeah right. We also know that another aging star has also turned them down. Who would that be?

Talk show personality and general sleaze bucket Geraldo Rivera said on August 5 that he'd been asked to compete. The aging "star" was already in the news for tweeting a photo of himself wearing just a towel (My eyes! My eyes!) but he said he turned them down, tweeting: 

Honored to be asked to do DWTS. It's a great show, enduring and energetic. Sorry Deena but can't for lots of reasons including a bad foot Thx.

Aww, too bad. But don't fret too much. Val Chmerkovskiy has some great ideas for who HE'D like to bring on. While they might seem a little over the top, they do kind of get the mind churning. 

He mentioned Beyonce, saying, "Clearly, Beyonce has great work ethic and that's what I'm looking for in a partner." He also mentioned (and brace yourself here) Oprah: "She'd be great and work extra hard to win."

Yes. Yes she would. Is it likely? No. But it would be incredible. And never say never. The cast will be announced in less than a month on September 4, 2013 during Good Morning America. If they get Oprah and Beyonce, I'll be ecstatic.

Who do you think will be on season 17?

Image via ABC

Click the "Like" button below if you're a fan of Dancing With The Stars. Sasha Brown-Worsham ABOUT THE AUTHOR Sasha Brown-Worsham

can't decide whether she is a mother, writer, or runner, but is usually all three at some point each day. She has written for dozens of print magazines, newspapers, and websites. She rarely ever writes on bathroom walls.

More
?
reacties | | Read More...

'Walking Dead' Season 4: Show Creator Says He Might Kill Daryl Because We Love Him So Much

Penulis : Unknown on maandag 29 juli 2013 | 04:57

maandag 29 juli 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Linda Sharps 2 hours ago

Daryl DixonHey who's the hottest character on The Walking Dead LOL J/K LIKE THIS IS EVEN UP FOR DEBATE. Haaaa, that was funny how I pretended for a second that there was any possible acceptable answer other than Daryl Dixon.

Daryl, who's played on the show by Norman Reedus, has obviously become an overwhelming fan favorite (despite the fact that he wasn't in the original comics, and he was never meant to be a long-term character!). His popularity has spawned a thousand "IF DARYL DIES WE RIOT" t-shirts, and his fan base is … well, let's just call them devoted. (OMG, you should see the comments on his Instagram photos.) (Yes I follow him on Instagram, shut up.)

We obviously don't yet know what all is going to happen to Daryl in season 4, but here are some important things to keep in mind -- including the possibily of Daryl's DEATH.

(Warning: upcoming spoiler for season 3!)

Just how is it that Daryl seems to have a constant supply of arrows for his bow?

It's true that Daryl's never-ending arrows seem a little similar to Hershel's hilarious infinite ammo mode from the season 2 finale, right?

But it turns out there's a perfectly reasonable explanation. In addition to the fact that Daryl typically pulls his arrows back out of the skulls he plants them in, Reedus tells Entertainment Weekly,

They go on runs and we raid places and this is Georgia so that is one of the weapons that people hunt with. So it’s not unheard of to find more arrows. (…) When you show this large of a time frame, there’s a lot of things that are sort of understood. You never see us go to the bathroom, but we do that.

How will Merle's death affect Daryl as a person, as the show goes on?

I think that Daryl was always destined to be a mini Merle. I try to play him like he was embarrassed of who he was becoming … he didn't want to say racist things, he didn't want to do drugs … as a kid he was sort of embarrassed that that was the life he was born into. So once Merle is out of the picture, Daryl has the opportunity to become the man he was never going to be. You know, someone he could be proud of … I think he's slowly starting to find value in himself through other people. And I think he wouldn't have had that opportunity before if Merle was still in the picture.

 Is it theoretically possible that Daryl will die in season 4?

Yes, and if he DOES die, it's because we all LOVED HIM TOO DAMN MUCH. According to creator Robert Kirkman,

I feel like it's a dare. Like, 'Oh, really? You're going to riot? We'll see. No one is safe.'

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! I mean, that's fine, Kirkman. We totally don't care. Whatever. Kill Daryl if you (*breaks down and sobs*)

Do you think Daryl's going to get more screen time in season 4? Or do you think Kirkman may really follow through on his cruel threat?

Image via AMC

Click the "Like" button below to get Linda Sharps's stories on Facebook. Linda Sharps ABOUT THE AUTHOR Linda Sharps

lives in Eugene, Oregon with her family, where she works from home while wrangling two rambunctious boys. She always has a caffeinated beverage in hand and a LEGO embedded in her foot.

More
?
reacties | | Read More...
 
| Powered by Bulikpost |