Famous Professor Claims ‘Mild Pedophilia’ Is No Big Deal

zaterdag 14 september 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Jenny Erikson 23 hours ago

Professor DawkinsFamous scientist, writer, and professor Richard Dawkins revealed in a new autobiography that he was the victim of ‘mild pedophilia’ as a child, and that it was no big deal. He then went on record with Time Magazine saying, “I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours.”

Dawkins claims that as a child at boarding school, one of the schoolmasters “pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts.” After conferring with other boys after the fact, he discovered that he wasn’t the only one. While he admits that it was “extremely disagreeable,” he doesn’t believe the man’s “touching up” of him and his friends caused any lasting harm.

Well thank God he survived that just fine, and even more so that he can speak for the innermost thoughts and emotions of those other abused boys.

I just … I can’t ... I mean … what the what??

How can anyone defend any pedophilia in any way, shape, or form? Dawkins to took to Twitter this week to defend his comments, saying, “’Mild touching up’ is bad. Raping 8-year-old wife to death is worse. Worse? That’s putting it mildly. Quantitative judgment vs black/white.”

So now mild pedophilia is bad? I thought it did no lasting harm? Make up your mind, Professor.

Furthermore, does this sound to anyone else like he might as well be saying it’s ok for a man to slap his wife around, so long as he doesn’t break her nose or kill her or anything? She might find the episodes disagreeable, but they won’t do her any lasting harm, and she’ll get over it. She may even be grateful that she wasn’t the victim of worse abuse!

Let’s make something patently clear. It’s never ok to abuse a child -- sexually, physically, verbally, or emotionally. Yes, there is a spectrum of abuse, all the way from name-calling or telling a kid something is their fault when it isn’t, to rape and murder. It is all bad, and all indefensible.

Just because kids grow up and survive doesn’t make abuse of any form or degree “no big deal.”

Do you think that ‘mild pedophilia’ is a big deal?

Image via Matti A/Flickr

ABOUT THE AUTHOR Jenny Erikson

is a conservative chick living in Southern California with her two daughters. She loves politics and hates laundry.

More
?

reacties | | Read More...

Kim Kardashian's Famous Butt Might Be Thanks to Plastic Surgery -- Are You Really Surprised?

donderdag 22 augustus 2013

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
by Emily Abbate 3 hours ago

It's been one of the biggest mysteries in all of Hollywood: Is Kim Kardashian's butt the REAL deal? The Dash doll tried to prove her derriere's authenticity on an episode of Keeping Up With the Kardashians, even going as far as getting her butt x-rayed. When the results showed no sign of an implant, I personally was convinced and astonished by the laws of nature that Kim's backside was 100 percent Kardashian genes. Now, a source is saying that we may have all been fooled.

A source told Life & Style Magazine that Kim had fat injected into her butt after receiving liposuction on her legs, and that's why the extra oomph didn't show up on her infamous x-ray. A doctor added that Kim may even have an implant that doesn't show up on an x-ray -- one which the world may never know about.

Alright y'all, so Kim's backside may not be all her own. But honestly, what's the big deal?

Whether or not Kim had fat injections into her but, she's entitled. I mean, think about all of the celebrities, especially reality TV stars, who have Botox, breast implants, or other work done all of the time. These procedures, they're all elective. These stars are choosing to change their appearance, and if that's what they want, then so be it.

Of course Kim is going to claim her butt all-natural. It's something uniquely hers and she's known for it! You know what? That's just fine. Kim doesn't owe any of us anything. Her butt is part of her brand. Personally, I think we all need to spend less time worrying about whether or not Kim had work done on her backside, and use our time for better purposes. You know, like contemplating what work Amanda Bynes has actually had done. Now THAT is a mystery.

Do you think Kim Kardashian's butt is 100 percent real?

Image via kimkardashian/Instagram

Click the "Like" button below if you're Krazy for the Kardashians!
?

reacties | | Read More...